Here are some ways to
apply what you've learned ...
Professional
Development
Self Assessment:
Observe your Classroom Instruction/Start a Teaching Portfolio
For many years,
video taped lectures and portfolio development have been
used by teachers to evaluate their teaching effectiveness.
Develop
your criteria of important teaching skills by which
you will evaluate yourself (rubric). Criteria could
include: clarity of presentation topic (What is the
muddiest point in your lecture?), lecture design, and
classroom management.
Arrange
for your Instructional Media department or Faculty Development
center to video tape a lecture from a single class.
View your
taped lecture. Using your rubric criteria, note strengths
and weaknesses
Use your
notes to develop a professional development plan. What
books, seminars, or conferences can you attend to strengthen
weak areas?
If possible,
once you've strengthened a weak area or two, video tape
the same lecture (in the following semester or two)
and compare your lectures.
Further
Reading/References
Read more about
faculty self assessment, teacher portfolios, and professional
development.
Crotty,
Teri, and Russel O'Keefe. (1999) Evaluating Self-Assessment
as a Means of Professional Development. http://ericae.net/ericdc/ED432563.htm
. Available from the ERIC Document Reproduction
Service).
Cerbin,
W. (1994) The Course Portfolio as a Tool for Continuous
Improvement of Teaching and Learning. Journal on
Excellence in College Teaching, 5 (1), 95-105. Available
online through subscription service or in library journal
archives.
Doolittle,
Peter (1994). Teacher portfolio assessment. Practical
Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 4(1). Available online:
http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=4&n=1
Setteducati,
David. (1995) Portfolio Self-Assessment for Teachers:
A Reflection on the Farmingdale Model. Journal of
Staff Development, v. 16 n3 p2-5 Summer 1995.
In
the Classroom
Take
the Steps to Start Classroom Assessment
Try
a simple classroom assessment. The following information
may be found in Angelo and Cross' Classroom Assessment
Techniques:
Step
One-Plan: Select one class in which to try out a
classroom assessment. Choose a course that you know
well and one in which most students are succeeding.
Angelo and Cross suggest not trying out a new assessment
on a problematic class until you become experienced
with a particular assessment. Choose a simple and quick
assessment to apply such as one of the five listed below.
For details please see: http://www.indiana.edu/~teaching/sfcats.html
or purchase Angelo and Cross' book (see References below))
The
Muddiest Point (Asseses what students are unclear
about)
The
One-Sentence Summary (Assesses student skill at summarizing
a large amount of information in a highly structured,
compact format)
Directed
Paraphrasing (Assesses student understanding of a
concept or procedure)
Applications
Cards (Assesses learners skill at transference. Elicits
possible applications of lessons learned in class
to real life)
Step
Two-Implement: Let students know what you are going
to do and why you are asking them for information. Make
sure students understand the procedure and how much
time they have to complete the assessment. Let students
know the assessment is not graded. Write instructions
on the board or overhead transparency.
Collect
the responses
Read
them quickly as soon as you can (immediately after
class is best).
Spend
one to two minutes analyzing the feedback
Sort
responses into three piles: 1) on-target; 2) close;
3) off-target
Number
and approximate percentage of the total class that
each of the piles represents.
Step
Three-Respond: Let students know what you learned
from the Classroom Assessment Technique and what difference
that information will make. Think about how you will
inform the class about their responses. For example,
you could tell the class, "Fifty percent of you
thought that database indexing was the 'muddiest' point."
Improve
Teaching on Campus: Collaborative Peer Review
Start
collaborative peer review on your campus.
Using
campus email, campus mail, and/or personal invitation
invite faculty to start a collaborative peer review
group.
Suggested
group review items include
classroom observations, videotaped class sessions, analysis
of teaching portfolios, assessment of the instructor's
evaluation of student work.
Establish
a constructive, positive review environment.
Establish
guidelines and criteria by which instructors are reviewed
Relate
evaluations to teaching sklls
Link
evaluations to profession development
Boyd
suggests the following in reporting the results of an
evaluation:
deliver
the feedback in a positive and considerate way
offer
ideas and suggest changes that make sense to the
teacher
maintain
a level of formality necessary to achieve the goals
of the evaluation
maintain
a balance between praise and criticism
give
enough feedback to be useful but not so much as
to overwhelm the teacher
Further
Reading/References
Although
the following references address the formal evaluation
process. The information in the articles below may be
adapted for a less formal, collaborative review environment.
Boyd,
Ronald T. C. (1989). Improving Teacher Evaluations.
Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. Available
online: http://ericae.net/pare/getvn.asp?v=1&n=7
Keig,
Larry and Michael D. Waggoner. (1995). Collaborative
Peer Review. The Role of Faculty in Improving College
Teaching. ERIC Digest. Available Online: http://ericae.net/ericdb/ED378924.htm